🔗 Share this article

The UN Security Council has passed a American-supported resolution that endorses Morocco's claim regarding the disputed Western Sahara, despite significant resistance from neighboring Algeria.

Divided Decision Bolsters Moroccan Stance

Although the recent vote was divided, the resolution represents the strongest endorsement to date for Morocco's plan to maintain sovereignty over the territory, which additionally enjoys support from most European Union countries and a growing number of African partners.

Resolution Structure and Important Components

The resolution describes Morocco's plan as a foundation for negotiation. As with earlier resolutions, the document makes no mention of a vote on self-determination that contains sovereignty as an option, which represents the solution long supported by the pro-independence Polisario Front and its supporters.

Real self-rule under Morocco's authority could constitute a most feasible solution.

Background Information

Western Sahara is a phosphate-rich stretch of coastal arid land the size of a US state which was under Spanish rule until 1975. It is claimed by both Morocco and the Polisario movement, which operates from refugee camps in southwestern Algeria and asserts to speak for the Sahrawi people indigenous to the contested region.

Voting Patterns and Global Responses

The United States, which sponsored the resolution, led 11 nations in deciding in favor, while 3 nations – Russia, China and Pakistan – declined to vote. Algeria, Polisario's main supporter, did not vote.

Mike Waltz, the American representative to the United Nations, said the decision had been "significant" and would "build on the momentum for a long, long overdue peace in Western Sahara".

Amar Bendjama, the Algerian ambassador to the UN, commented that while the resolution was an advancement on earlier iterations, it "contains a number of deficiencies".

Peacekeeping Mission and Upcoming Assessment

The measure also extends the UN security operation in the territory for an additional twelve months, as has been done for over thirty years. Prior extensions, however, have not included a reference to Morocco and its supporters' favored resolution.

The measure urges all sides participating to "seize this unprecedented chance for a enduring peace." Depending on progress, it requests the UN leader to assess the peacekeeping mission's mandate within half a year.

Area Consequences and Present Conditions

The shift could disrupt a protracted situation that for decades has escaped resolution, desdespite a UN peacekeeping mission that was intended to be temporary. Protests have followed in indigenous settlements in Algeria this recent period, where residents have vowed not to give up their struggle for independence.

The Moroccan government administers almost all of the territory, excluding a narrow strip known as the "free zone" that lies to the east of a constructed by Morocco sand wall.

Past Context and Recent Developments

A 1991-era truce was intended to facilitate a vote on independence, but disagreements over participation criteria blocked it from occurring.

Over the years, Morocco has transformed the disputed territory, constructing a deepwater port and a 656-mile highway. State subsidies keep basic commodity costs low, and the resident count has grown significantly as Moroccans settle in cities such as Dakhla and Laayoune.

Polisario withdrew from the truce in recent years after clashes near a route the government was constructing to neighboring Mauritania.

The group has since regularly reported security operations, while Morocco has primarily denied open conflict. The United Nations describes it "limited hostilities".

Global Relations and Coming Possibilities

In response to the draft resolution, the movement stated that it would not participate in any initiative aiming "to 'legitimise' Morocco's unauthorized presence," saying resolution "cannot happen by rewarding territorial claims".

The situation represents the central issue in regional diplomacy. The Moroccan government views endorsement of its autonomy plan as a standard for how it gauges its international partners.

Last October, the UN envoy suggested partitioning Western Sahara, a suggestion neither side accepted. He encouraged the government to clarify what autonomy would entail and cautioned that a lack of development might question the United Nations' role and "whether there is space and willingness for us to still be effective."

The push to review the UN operation comes as the US slashes financial support for UN programmes and organizations, covering peacekeeping.