🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and his lead went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for him, where the opponent was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However Mamdani gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and it’s people facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he boosted his base of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for the progressive now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report as of Wednesday morning. So I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. This happened prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are neighborhoods with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were strongly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises on this one, but Mamdani did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in the US can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.