🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by over 50%, following a controversial law change that forced local governments to submit the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors depending on demographic data, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Māori ward by initially putting it to a public vote in their area. Communities often devoted considerable time generating local support and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing many regions against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. Since taking office, the current administration has ushered in sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. Officials has said it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of eligible voters casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are permitted to establish different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Māori representation.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to retain their seats.